Friday, March 8, 2013

The Lenten-Musings 43



The Lenten-Musings 43
Friday, March 8
Read: Romans 16
                   Today is International Women's Day. On this day people often, tend to remember women who have made a mark in their field and have been channels of transformation and change. But there are some who tend to be relegated to the sidelines and often forgotten because their battles have been long drawn and they are still fighting their battle. On this day,  I believe I need to bring to our attention the life and struggle of Irom Sharmila, human rights activist from Manipur, India. Sharmila is fondly called as the Iron Lady of Manipur and she has been on fast for the last 12 years. Fasting to demand the repeal of a controversial Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which provides the security forces to shoot at sight and arrest anybody without any warrant. She undertook this fast on November 2, 2000 when she witnessed  to the killing of 10 people at a bus stop near her home. Three days into her hunger strike, Sharmila was arrested on charges of attempted suicide, sent to a prison hospital and put on a nasal drip. In fact the charges of attempted suicide is still foisted on her and a few days back when she had to attend the court proceedings, she told the court that " I don't want to commit suicide. Mine is a non-violent protest. It is my demand to live as a human being. I love life. I do not want to take my life. I want justice and peace".  Today, the 40 year old Sharmila is frail but very stoic and full of resolve to continue her hunger strike. Sharmila does not come on the front page of the news magazines nor on the news channel, may be because for the channels her fight for justice may not have the ingredients to boost the star rating of the channels or the news agencies. But she is remembered very passively once in a while. People tend to take her fight for justice and peace as something not serious and an issue that they are not interested as the issues related to her hunger strike has nothing to do with them. In a day when you will have number of discussions and symposium on empowering woman, the greatest discrimination that a society could do to people like Sharmila,  is to take her and her fight for granted. We don't  want to be serious about her and her cause because the very attitude that a patriarchal society tends to  promulgate is to put certain boundaries both in life and in our perceptions with regards to the way woman has to function, in family, church and society. Unless those boundaries are not broken or widened, woman like Sharmila and host of other unknown women who are struggling for justice and peace, will always be relegated to the sidelines of the society.
Apostle Paul has been vociferously condemned and criticized for his writings about his stand on woman and their role in the church. But this criticism comes when we do not comprehensively study Paul's epistles and his attitudes in contextual terms and understanding. In Romans 16:1,2, we find Paul recommending Phoebe, one who serves the church in Cenchreae. The Apostle Paul addresses Phoebe, in Greek as Deacon of the Church. Thus you find a very unique contribution of the church in the early years of its existence of appointing woman as deacons. Thus you had woman deacons like Phoebe who must have been appointed by the apostles and had an office of service. People may tend to misinterpret the word used to describe Phoebe as "one who serves the church". The word used in Greek is "diakonon" and is both masculine and feminine accusative form of the noun, when translated in English is deacon and also could denote the word servant. Thus,  the early church had no problems in appointing woman as deacons to serve the church. However, today the very understanding of deacon has changed and also its gender affiliations. Deacons were meant as a position to serve in the church, but today it is considered as an office of authority and position. When the word deacon became a position of authority and office, came the denial of woman from this office. Male could be a deacon since it is a position of authority and power, while woman should not have position and authority and hence the best way to deny woman authority and position is to restrict the functioning of woman, by consciously limiting their role to the other English translation of deacon- a servant. Man as a deacon is a position of authority, while woman is considered more as a servant or one who is consciously condemned to do the job of service. It is this type of deliberate misinterpretation of biblical truths and historical facts that denigrates the role of the woman in the church and the society. On this women's day,  let us consciously rise above such hollow and lopsided interpretations of biblical truths and work in such a way that church and society could break or broaden its boundaries so that everyone irrespective of one's gender is able to contribute meaningfully to the growth of the church.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

The Lenten-Musings 42



The Lenten-Musings 42
Thursday, March 7
Read: Luke 7: 36-50
There would be number of people who would have missed flights because they were late to the airport or they would have missed a connecting flight, because of some delay in their onward flight journey. Airlines normally stick to flight timings and have a no nonsense attitude about their services. But recently,  an airline deliberately broke rules to bring out the humane element in their flight services. Katia Hetter of CNN reported yesterday a poignant incident that happened on a United Airlines flight. On January 24th, a San Francisco resident,  Kerry Drakes had to rush to Lubbock, Texas to be at the bed side of his mother who was dying. He was travelling on a United Airlines flight to Houston, from where he had only about 40 minutes to catch the connecting flight to Lubbock.  But unfortunately his onward flight to Houston got delayed and he became frantic that we would not be able to see his mother before she breathed her last.  This thought brought anguish in him and he started sobbing bitterly in the flight. The flight attendants tried to comfort him and told him that they would try to help him in any way they can. Soon he landed in Houston and began running to the gate to board the connecting flight, knowing well that he was late and in a faint hope that the flight would not have left. But to his surprise as he ran to a gate, a flight agent  called out to Drakes and told him that they were waiting for him to board the flight. That is when Drakes realized that flight had not yet left. On enquiring Drakes realized, that the captain of his previous flight radioed ahead about his situation, and the crew at Houston decided to deliberately delay the flight so that Drakes could make it to the flight to Lubbock. Drakes could make it to the hospital in time to see his mother breathing her last. Overcome with emotions he was so grateful to United Airlines for going that extra mile, for deliberately flexing the rules so that he could be the bed side of his mother. Breaking rules, or flouting norms  are the order of the day and this is normally done to gain financial favours or material benefits. Rules flouted for achieving ones selfish desires and needs, but here is a case of an airline who flouts norms and rules to be sensitive to the person in need. A wonderful example of being sensitive to the need of a person in pain.
                             One of the strange and unique ways that Jesus did his ministry was to flout the norms of the day or flexing some rules and laws. Laws that seemed or understood as something that cannot be flouted under any circumstances. But why did Jesus break rules or flout certain norms of the day?. Every time Jesus flouted rules and laws, there was a genuine intention of empathy and being sensitive to the needs of others. In Luke 7: 36-50 we find an incident that happened as Jesus dined at the house of Simon the Pharisee. As he was eating and enjoying the fellowship at the home of Simon, a woman comes and wets  his feet with tears and pours the perfume that she had bought,  on the feet of Jesus. The woman was considered a woman of bad reputation and this action brought about an outright indignation in the mind of Simon the Pharisee. The indignation came about because in the first place she was not invited to his house and thus she has gate crashed into  a fellowship which he considered as a fellowship of so called holy people, who kept the religious laws very strictly. Not only had she gate crashed, she also has the audacity to express her emotions and feeling by wiping his feet with her perfume and tears. The woman had flouted social and religious rules of the day to be with Jesus. But Jesus does not condemn her and on the contrary justifies her action by telling Simon the difference between the welcome he gave and the kind of gesture that this woman did. What Simon saw was the reputation of the woman, a woman who is a sinner, condemning her without getting inside her world. But what Jesus did was to enter into the world of the woman, and thus he could see her true  emotions, feelings, and the genuiness of her actions in expressing her remorse and the kind of life she lived. It is this genuiness of her actions that made Jesus Christ to consciously break rules and moral norms so as to publicly acknowledge the worth of a so called sinful woman and condemn the action of his host. What is needed today in our life is that we need to enter into the world of others, to genuinely understand people and their needs, and only then can we be sensitive and be empathetic to others.. Here in this context, Jesus broke the law not to satisfy his selfish desires on the contrary to uplift a woman who was condemned by the world. United Airlines deliberately flouted rules so as to help a person who was in need. What is needed in lent is an effort by all of us to enter into the world of others who are in need, ready to walk the extra mile, ready to flout the rule and laws of the world so that through that action, so that we could truly be sensitive to the needs of others and lend a helping hand to others.

Friday, March 1, 2013

The Lenten-Musings 41

The Lenten-Musings 41
Friday, March 1
Read: Luke 15: 11-32
                            If we observe some of the news that comes from India, it is unearthing of corruption almost every day. Corruption at all levels and at all fields.  Lust for money seems to unite people from all fields of life whether politics, dramatics or church. But as news agencies beams incidents of corruption at the highest corridors of power, there is small state in north east India, that is creating small ripples in history. Nobody seems to notice this state or the leader who leads the state. Elections was held in three northeastern states of Meghalaya, Nagaland and Tripura.  One of the unique aspects of the election result is that the Left Front has come to power in Tripura for the fifth consecutive term. This is mainly because of its chief minister Manik Sarkar. Looking at the lifestyle of the chief minister one may wonder, whether such a person still exist in Indian politics. He could be considered as one of the poorest chief ministers in India. In the affidavit that he submitted before he contested the elections,  he has revealed what his true wealth is.  In 2008, Manik  Sarkar had Rs. 16, 120 as cash and bank deposits while in 2013 it got reduced to Rs. 10,800. He donates his salary as chief minister to the party fund and in return, the party pays him Rs. 5000 as allowance. His wife Panchali Bhattacharya, is a retired government officer and according to her affidavit,  she has around 24 Lakh in bank deposits, while having about twenty two thousand rupees in her hand. The chief minister does not even have a house. He had inherited a small house from his mother in 2009, but he donated that too to his kin. Whenever he has to move around for his official duty,  he uses the official vehicle, while his wife uses a cycle rickshaw to travel though quite often she prefers walking by foot. It is said that till last month, the chief ministers wife washed her clothes by herself,  but after she has undergone a heart surgery, the doctors have advised her from doing any hard labour. When others in teh political and religious field is trying to further their financial assets, you have chief minister of a state who has no interest in doing so and on the contrary dedicating his life for the party and people. I think Manik  Sarkar is a model and a person who can critique all the politicians especially the so called Marxist leaders  in Kerala, the religious leaders  of today who are trying to build an opulent style of living. Here is a leader whose true wealth is in his people and in dedicating ones life for the service of others. I think it is in this context that we need to ask ourselves the question as what our true wealth in life is? .
               In Luke 15, we find three beautiful parable that Jesus mentions. In the third parable, we find a beautiful story of a family where you find three different characters having three different perspective of life. All of them show what life is all about and what their true wealth and assets in life is. It is the father in the parable who teaches us what is true wealth in life is. When his younger son stakes claim to his share, though the father is distressed at the attitude of the younger son, he willingly gives away his riches to his son, knowing well that the riches actually does not belong to him at that particular time and phase of his life. But, his father valued his son more than his riches. Later when the wayward son returns, the father is overjoyed to receive him. The father covers the son with the best robe and puts a ring on him. He knows the value of son returning back to his home. The son has learnt a lesson in life as to where true wealth lies. Not in riches, not in enjoyment in life but in relationship with his loving father, living in a home where you have wonderful relationships. But when the younger son comes, the elder son is upset. Upset because, his brother had spent all his share of property and now he has come back again. With his return,  he knows that all that was legally his, is once again going to be divided. He is upset that he is going to be poorer again, but his father teaches him that it is not in riches that one should put ones focus and objective in life. The brother who was dead has returned and one needs to rejoice in having his brother back. Wealth to be understood in terms of relationships gained not lost, true wealth understood in having more and more qualitative relationship, true wealth understood in terms of giving up for the other. We have leaders who leave a legacy of amassing wealth in the most unholy means and leaders who have no guilt nor shame in preaching from roof tops about doing service to the poor, but lead a life style that is contrary to what has been preached. Hence you have people from all sections who are also tempted to live a life where focus is to amass wealth. Let us praise God that we still have leaders in India like Manik Sarkar who shows through his life what commitment is, what true ministry or service is and what should be true assets in life. Let us ask this lent what our true assets  in life is?